The nature of man and the nature of sin: Part 2

Definition of sin: An act that is regarded by theologians as a transgression of God’s will. Estrangement from god.

In my last blog I attempted  to define  the nature of man and the nature of son. So far as the bible is concerned  the nature of man and the nature of sin are intrinsically intertwined. So far as a biblical definition of sin is concerned the best example is given here  1Jn 3:4 Everyone who practices sin also practices lawlessness; and sin is lawlessness. We call  this transgression of divine law.

In my last blog most of what I wrote points  to the results of sin. Our behavior, our attitude and not lest of these is our propensity to go against that which is lawful and right.

Depending on ones world view whether it is religious  or not our view of  what sin is can differ greatly. Some may think unfaithfulness is morally wrong but stealing the office supplies  from work isn’t. Others may  think that stealing the office  supplies  from work is wrong but lying about or fraudulently claiming work hours when they didn’t work those hours is okay. Another one could be  the old saying   that white lies are okay because  they don’t harm anyone. In my mind this really means  so  long as no one finds out  you  told  a lie it may not harm others but  if  you are caught out in a lie it may harm someone.

The point is that what each person  thinks is  sin or an infraction of  the rules may be completely different from the next person. It isn’t my objective here  to differentiate between what we might call a minor sin as opposed  to a major sin, my point here is  to say that regardless of  the sin it is a transgression of the rules. The bible says  this, Rom 3:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,

I have said  it a few  times already that each persons opinion may differ on this subject. So this being the case whose opinion matters? The environmentalist may think its a sin  to over graze the land or destroy native habitats belonging  to an endangered species. Vegan’s believe it is wrong  to eat other living animals variously because of the way  they may be farmed and slaughtered, or simply because  they have life and we have not right  to take it away from them. But then killing an unborn child is the choice of  a mother, it’s her body after all. I am not saying this is the view of environmentalists and Vegan’s What I am trying  to demonstrate is  the inconsistency in our world view. If we hold to the sanctity of life on one level but deny life a chance on another level, we then play god  to determine what life is and when it begins in the first place.

Okay enough examples; I could  go on and demonstrate how we can can hold conflicting positions within our own paradigms. What I am getting at is who decides what is right or wrong? Moralist and ethicist philosophers argue this subject all  the time. Very often the morals and ethics that we argue for and against are situational or hypothetical. The arguments are meant to be objective not emotional, however often  times  the arguments are emotionally based and subjective or even anecdotal. A few of the subjects I raised above are good examples where the emotions are often engaged rather  than the intellect. The facts are often blurred by other issues not directly relevant to the subject matter itself while in some religious debates on right and wrong, (sin) the facts and intellect are dismissed altogether and an appeal to divine revelation is put in its place. I will deal with the issue of divine revelation another time.

So this leads to the question of who is the arbiter of truth? Who gets to decide or determine what sin is? Do we determine for ourselves what right and wrong is? Did we in some prehistoric past construct the idea of right and wrong while roasting mammoth over the campfire. Then so we didn’t have to take credit for spoiling everyone’s fun we invented God to take the blame for it all? Even from an evolutionary and anthropological perspective that scenario stretches the imagination. Yet that’s exactly how our education system theorizes or rather imagines we came to define sin or right and wrong. Then call God a myth and sin negative!

Atheists often argue that religion is evil  because it dominates and controls individuals, they caricature history and all the mistakes people made in the name of God as a defense  that there is no God. If there is no God then it corresponds that their is no such thing as evil. Evil implies a negative influence or persona called  the devil. All the bad  stuff  that happened in the bible can’t be God’s fault because if God didn’t tell us  to do it (He doesn’t exist) then even if we try to argue  that religion is bad; then it is only bad because it was invented by humanity! What  does that say  about humanity? But if  there is no right and wrong  then our actions are only relative to how we think it effects ourselves or others.

Oddly enough we have a legal system in every society that limits what we may or may not  do but we don’t call that a bad thing. We call law a good thing because it protects our rights and freedoms. But if it prevents us from carrying out  an action prescribed by the law as wrong then it is limiting our freedom and imposing on our right to act freely; how is that fair? Once more we end up back at the question of  who is the arbiter who decides all this stuff? Are we really prepared  to go so far as to say we created all this without any help from a divine influence. If we created God as a means of limiting ourselves and also constructing many of the legal precedents we have based on moral law, we can  give ourselves a hearty pat on the back and live in hope that the author of this majestic system can be discovered.

If we can believe we were actually smart enough to do all  this then why does history  show that we have so royally screwed it up? I am not trying to be a pessimist, history speaks for itself the bible supports what history shows us  about ourselves as human beings. When a judicial system is set up, people go about circumventing it. In the case of Israel where  the system was theocratic all it did was show  that even under a system developed around  the idea of God, failed miserably. THEY TRANSGRESSED! Israel couldn’t obey or wouldn’t obey so then they demanded   God to give them a king, a monarchy. Same end result, they failed miserably!

So if we didn’t construct all this stuff about good and evil, right and wrong and sin, then someone else must have communicated it to us. If we have transgressed a set of laws constructed by someone else  who is that someone? The bible claims God made the laws and defined sin. Adam knew in the garden of Eden what he shouldn’t do, don’t eat of the tree of knowledge  of good and evil. There was one simple law  to follow, Adam broke that law. So now if God exists and He set the parameters by which we can live, then my conclusion is that God is the arbiter.

Returning to my opening definition, sin is anything we  do  that transgresses God’s law. Anyone who transgresses God’s law practices sin. Sin can be defined as doing that which we ought not do. Anything we do that goes against God’s law is  sin. Even if we have only ever done one thing wrong no matter how minor we are under sins penalty we are separated from God. Even if we have never committed sin we are still under the curse of sin through Adam because he is our original ancestor. Christ however was born of a woman by the Holy Spirit no man was involved.

Because of Christ we are not  left floundering without hope, where 1 John 4:3 tells us that all who practice lawlessness practice sin, we aren’t left  to our own devices. God in His great mercy made a way out for us through his Son. John goes on to say this, 1Jn 3:5 You know that He (Christ) appeared in order to take away sins; and in Him (Christ) there is no sin.

So we are not left without hope, in fact we are given hope that there is a solution to our transgressions whatever they may be. In closing I leave you with the following thoughts. I hope they are helpful  to you.

Rom_5:6 For while we were still helpless, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly.

Rom_5:8 But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

1Co_15:3 For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures,


1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s